If a tree falls

If a tree falls in the city and no one hears it.

More details and pictures at 
http://blogblogsheldon.blogspot.ca/2012/04/if-tree-falls.html

Using Kodak or Matin Film Leader Extractor Tool

It has been a long time since I've posted an entry.

I haven't used 35mm film for a long, long time. I'm selling some stuff on ebay, including a Kodak film extractor. The tool pulls the leader from the inside of a film cassette.

Unfortunately, the extractor doesn't have an instruction sheet.  And if  you just try to follow the visual instructions, it can be very frustrating. So I had to learn how to use it again. I've posted a video to youtube (see below) showing the Kodak extractor in action..

The Kodak extractor is the same design as the Matin extractor. The original Matin instructions are also below.

The keys to using the Kodak or Matin extractor are:

1. With the spindle down turn the spindle a few times counter-clockwise.
2. Make sure the film is inserted completely into the tool  AND stays inserted completely.
3. The slides should move easily. If they don't, start over.
4. With first slide all the way over, hold close to ear, turn spindle counter-clockwise  and stop as soon as you hear a click. 

You probably should watch the video first.  You may not need to follow the overly detailed Matin instructions.

 Kodak Film Extractor Tool showing the side with Visual Instructions. The visual instructions work when you use the other side of the extractor.

 Kodak Extractor Side Without Visual Instructions. It is the same design as the Matin.  In the video, this side is used once the cassette is inserted to follow the visual instructions.


Video


Correction In two places, I say turn the spindle clockwise.
 I meant counter-clockwise which is what I'm doing in the video.


Original Matin Film Extractor Instructions

Wakefield Transcripts Grouped

About the Transcripts

Transcripts for the UK General Medical Council disciplinary hearing against Dr.Wakefield, Professor Walker-Smith and Professor Murch grouped by type of witness. Transcripts are also available in day order without editorial comment at Wakefield Transcripts in Day Order at www.sheldon101blog.blogspot.com . A file with all transcripts zipped is here. For more information on the transcripts, including privacy concerns, see here.


From the closing submissions by Ms Sally Smith QC, lawyer hired by the GMC to 'prosecute' the doctors in the disciplinary hearing.

First of all, it is about a group of children whose ages in 1996 ranged from nearly three-and-a-half to nine.  Quite properly we have been anonymising them, but of course they were not numbers, they were vulnerable children.  I want to say at this stage, because of its importance, that no-one doubts or has questioned the tragedy of these children’s disorders,nor, of course, the love of their parents nor their parents’ desire to do the very best that theycould for them.  This case is about the nature of the doctors’ duties towards the patient, and ofcourse it is the child who is the patient in every case......

[W]e submit that underlying many of the allegations, perhaps those against Dr Wakefield in particular, there is a refusal to subject his own conduct to appropriate scrutiny, whether that is by an ethics committee or ultimately by the editor of the publication in which he seeks to publish his research, in this case The Lancet. He did not consult, we say, he went ahead on the basis of his own evaluation of the ethics of what he was doing and what he thought was or was not escapable.  We say that he did that without any regard for the boundaries which should have constrained him and that is what was wrong with what he did.   Day 122  page 2

That is the first limb of the case that we say is fundamental.  The second is about the integrity of papers which are submitted to scientific journals... We say the paper that was ultimately published, The Lancet paper, was profoundly misleading.  The clear impression that it gave was that during the course of research investigations into behavioural and gastrointestinal disorders in these children a striking coincidental temporal link with MMR vaccination was drawn by a series of parents.  If you like, it was stumbled upon by those parents, and of course by the doctors who then wrote it up in those terms.  In truth, we say that link was inevitably going to be made since, as was well known to Dr Wakefield and Professor Walker-Smith, those who had the investigations had come to the Royal Free Hospital for those investigations on the very basis that their parents had made that link.   Day 122/3

Into this case the defence have sought, we say, to inject layer upon layer of complexity. Remember all these three doctors were at the time of these charges senior members of their profession, some of course more senior than others... They have got no excuse for not understanding and operating the distinction between research and clinical medicine; the basic principles of medical research ethics; of the requirements relating to the submission for publication to scientific journals, and the requirement for rigour in the way in which thoseprojects were written up... We submit that all three of them have taken stances which it is our submission are in many respects frankly incredible and they have done so in an attempt to persuade you that the case against them cannot be proved.(emphasis added) Day 122/5   (emphasis added to quotations)

GMC Documents (Not Part of Transcripts)
Full GMC Fact Finding Determination Formal Sanctions Determination for Dr. Wakefield Formal Sanctions Determination for Professor Walker-Smith Formal Sanctions Determination for Professor Murch
Opening Statement by GMC Lawyer
Day 1	Reading of Charges and Amendments	GMC's Lawyer.  The GMC's lawyer while hired by the GMC is independent of the panel deciding the case.The GMC lawyer has the same role as a prosecutor in a criminal case.
Day 2 Day 3 Day 4	Opening Statement GMC	GMC's Lawyer
Parents of The Children The Big Lie According to the Big Lie repeated over and over again by many supporters of Wakefield to explain the results of the GMC hearing --- the parents were not allowed to testify. This Big Lie has been repeated so often and so effectively that the parents believe it. For example, in a testimonial for Professor Walker-Smith, the mother of Child 6 and & 7 stated: I am saddened that I was not allowed to give evidence on behalf of my boys and was upset to hear the lies about my family from the other side. I felt we did not have a voice and my boys were not protected in this. Day 199/28  And from an open letter by the parents read as a testimonial: We have been following the GMC hearings with distress as we, the parents, have had no opportunity to refute the allegations. For the most part we have been excluded from giving evidence to support these doctors whom we all hold in very high regard. Day 199/33 But as the GMC's lawyer's stated in her opening submissions: The parents in this case, with the exception of the mother of child 12, to whom I am going to be referring later as “Mrs 12”, are not going to be giving evidence, and it is not part of our case that they were anything other than content with the investigations which were carried out on their children. Indeed, as you will be hearing, some of them positively encouraged those investigations to be carried out, but in the last analysis it must never be forgotten that the patient is the child. Day 3/3 Parents wanted to testify but none were called by the doctors, for obvious reasons. All Parents were asked to testify by the GMC. Just as with the children's GPs, the parents could have given very important testimony. Mrs. 12, who still supports Wakefield, provided testimony and documents that, by itself, proved most of the GMC case.
Day 28	Testimony and Documents of Mrs. 12	Mother of  Child 12
Children's Doctors
Day 5	Dr. Hopkins	GP Child 10
Day 5	Dr. Shantha	GP Child 3
Day 5	Dr. Barrow	GP Child 1
Day 6	Dr. N	GP Child 6 GP Child 7
Day 6	Dr.Letham	GP Child 5
Day 6 Day 7	Dr. Tapsfield	GP Child 4
Day 7	Dr. Stuart	GP Child 12
Day 43	Dr. Stuart (added to statement)	GP Child 12
Day 11	Dr. Shillam	GP Child 5
Day 14	Dr. Kirrage	Child JS
Day 14	Dr. Cartmel	GP Child 2
Day 19	Dr. Jones (statement)	GP Child JS
Day 19 Day 20	Dr. Andrew Mills	Consultant Child JS
Day 29	Dr. Jelley	GP Child 8
Day 23	Dr. Spratt (statement)	GP Child 12
Day 43	Frances Wharton (statement)	Secretary to Dr. Surtees re Child 2
Royal Free Hospital
Day 8 Day 9	Dr. Pegg	Chairman Ethics Committee, Royal Free Hospital
Day 12 Day 13	Dr. Berelowitz	Child Psychiatrist,  Royal Free Hospital
Day 14	Dr. Hodgson	Wakefield Employment Contract
Day 15 Day 16	Professor  Zuckerman	Dean, Royal Free Hospital to 1999
Day 19	Mr. Else	CEO, Royal Free Hospital
Day 21	Dr. Lloyd-Evans	Child Neurologist,  Royal Free Hosptital
Day 21	Mr. Phipps	Assistant Finance Officder Royal Free Hospital
Day 22	Professor Revell	Chairman, Histopathology Royal Free  Hospital
Day 24 Day 25 Day 26	Dr. Casson	Gastroenteroligist, Royal Free Hospital Main Patient Contact Wrote discharge summaries.
Day 30	Deborah Davies (statement)	Personal Assistant to CEO for Royal Free Hospital
Day 31	Cenzig Tarhan	Fi\nance Officer, Royal Free Hospital
Day 32 Day 33 Day 43	Dr. Davies Day 43 (addition to statement)	Histopathologist, Royal Free Hosptital
Legal Aid UK
Day 11	Mrs. Cowie	Legal Aid Lawyer
Day 30	Sarah Alwyn	Customer Service Manager
The Lancet
Day 16 Day 17 Day 18 Day 111	Dr. Horton  Testimony  Day 16, 17 & 18. Important Statement read Day 111	Editor of  The Lancet
Day 22	Professor Candy	Peer reviewed 1998 papers. Believed that either both papers or neither paper be published.
Experts called by GMC
Day 18	Professor Hull	Pediatric Research  Ethics Expert
Day 26 Day 27	Dr. Salisbury	UK vaccination Expert. Testified on the history of measles vaccine, MMR and Wakefield. Surprisingly, lawyers for doctors did not ask any questions.
Day 35 Day 36 Day 37 Day 38 Day 39	Professor Rutter	Child Development Expert
Day 40 Day 42 Day 43 Day 44 Day 45 Day 46 Day 47	Professor Booth	Pediatric Gastroenterology Expert Medical Research Expert
Day 47	Professor Lachmann	Immunology Expert
Experts called by Doctors All Defense Experts were called on behalf of Professor Walker-Smith
Day 101	Dr. Williams	Expert Gastronenterologist
Day 101 Day 102 Day 103 Day 104 Day 105 Day 106 Day 109	Dr.Victor Miller	Expert Gastroenterology Witness
Day 107 Day 108	Dr. Thomas	Expert Child Neurology Witness
Martin Walker Nonsensical Conflict of Interest Claim
Day 101	Martin Walker nonsense	Hack who could not begin to report the proceedings in a way that resembled reality.
Medical Research Council
Day34	Medical Research Council	Transcript of meeting read in part re selection bias. Video played.
Dr. Wakefield
Day 48 Day 49 Day 50 Day 51 Day 52 Day 53 Day 54 Day 55	Dr. Wakefield	Examined by Wakefield's Lawyer
Day 57	Dr. Wakefield	Cross-Examined by Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Day 57 Day 58	Dr. Wakefield	Cross-Examined  by Murch's Lawyer
Day 58 Day 59 Day 60 Day 61 Day 62 Day 63 Day 65 Day 66 Day 67	Dr, Wakefield	Cross-Examined  by GMC's Lawyer
Day 68	Dr. Wakefield	Re-examined by Wakefield's lawyer
Day 69	Dr. Wakefield	Further Cross-Examination by GMC's Lawyer
Professor Walker-Smith
Day 73 Day 74 Day 75 Day 76 Day 77 Day 78 Day 79 Day 80 Day 81 Day 82 Day 83 Day 84	Professor Walker-Smith	Examined by Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Day 85	Professor Walker-Smith	Cross-examined by Wakefield's Lawyer Cross-examined by Murch's Lawyer
Day 85 Day 86 Day 87 Day 88 Day 89 Day 90  Day 91 Day 92 Day 93 Day 94 Day 95 Day 96 Day 97	Professor Walker-Smith	Cross-examined by  GMC's Lawyer
Day 98 Day 99	Professor Walker-Smith	Re-examined by Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Day 100	Professor Walker-Smith	Questioned by the Panel Further Re-examined by Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Professor Murch
Day 110 Day 111 Day 112 Day 113 Day 114	Professor Murch	Examined by Professor Murch's Lawyer
Day 115 Day 116 Day 117 Day 118	Professor Murch	Crosss-examined by GMC's lawyer
Day 119	Professor Murch	Re-examined by Murch's Lawyer
Day 120	Professor Murch	Questioned by the Panel Further Cross-examined by GMC's Lawyer Re-examed by Murch's Lawyer
Closing Submissions
Day 122 Day 123 Day 124 Day 125 Day 126 Day 127 Day 128 Day 129	Closing Submissions The first pages of  Day 122 are a great summary of the case.	GMC's Lawyer
Day 130 Day 131 Day 132 Day 133 Day 134 Day 135 Day 136	Closing Submissions	Wakefield's Lawyer
Day 137 Day 138 Day 139 Day 140 Day 141 Day 142 Day 143 Day 144 Day 145	Closing Submissions	Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Day 146 Day 147	Closing Submissions	Murch's Lawyer
Day 149	Advice from Legal Assessor	Legal Assessor  Mr. Nigel Seed QC
Fact Finding Decision  28 January 2010
Day 197	Fact Finding Decision	The chairman read a shorter version of the panel'  fact finding determinations. The full version is here.
Sanctions  Hearing
Day  198	Submissions On Behalf of GMC	GMC's Lawyer
	No Submissions On Behalf of Dr. Wakefield	Wakefield's Lawyer (no submissions)
Day 199	Submissions On Behalf of Professor Walker-Smith	Testimonial Evidence Sir Christopher Booth Robertr Heuschkel Allan Walker Sir Nicholas Wright
Day 200	Submissions On Behalf of Professor Murch	Testimonial Evidence Edward Piele Michael Green Alison Rodger Concluding Submissions
Day 200	Legal Advice	Legal Assessor  Mr. Nigel Seed QC
Sanctions Determinations 24 May 2010
Day 217	Sanctions Decterminations	Panel Sanction Decisions  The GMC published  the same sanctions determinations for each doctor separately. Dr. Wakefield Professor Walker-Smith Professor Murch
The Rest of the Days
Day 10 Day 56	Panel Read Documents
Day 70 Day 71 Day 72	Day 70, Day 71 & Day 72 discuss the legal issue of whether the panel should force Mr. Barr to testify. The panel decided on Day 72  to not force Mr. Barr to testify	Mr. Barr was the lawyer suing MMR vaccine makers for causing autism.  All 11 UK children in the 1998 paper were clients.
Day 121	Discussion on Adjournment
Days 150 to 196	Panel Deliberations (in Camera) on Fact Finding	Panel
Days 201 to 216	Panel Deliberations (in Camera) on Sanctions	Panel

Wakefield Disciplinary Hearing Transcripts Grouped by sheldon101 is licensed under
 a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada License. 

Wakefield Transcripts in Day Order

About the Transcripts

Transcripts for the UK General Medical Council disciplinary hearing against Dr.Wakefield, Professor Walker-Smith and  Professor Murch in day order without editorial comment. Transcripts are also available grouped by witness type at Wakefield Transcripts Grouped at ww.sheldon101blog.blogspot.com.  A file with all transcripts zipped is here. For more information on the transcripts, including privacy concerns, see here.

Not Part of  The Transcripts Full GMC Fact Finding Determination Formal Sanctions Determination for Dr. Wakefield Formal Sanctions Determination for Professor Walker-Smith Formal Sanctions Determination for Professor Murch
Case for GMC
Day 1	Reading of Charges and Amendments	GMC's Lawyer. The GMC's lawyer while hired by the GMC is independent of the panel deciding the case. The GMC lawyer has the same role as a prosecutor in a criminal case.
Day 2	Opening Statement GMC	GMC's Lawyer
Day 3	Opening Statement GMC
Day 4	Opening Statement GMC
Day 5	Dr. Hopkins	GP Child 10
	Dr. Shantha	GP Child 3
	Dr. Barrow	GP Child 1
Day 6	Dr. N	GP Child 6 GP Child 7
	Dr.Letham	GP Child 5
	Dr. Tapsfield	GP Child 4
Day 7	Dr. Tapsfield
	Dr. Stuart	GP Child 12
Day 8	Dr. Pegg	Chairman Ethics Committee, Royal Free Hospital
Day 9	Dr. Pegg
Day 10	Panel Read Documents
Day 11	Mrs. Joanne Cowie	Legal Aid Board Lawyer
	Dr. Shillam	GP Child 5
Day 12	Dr. Berelowitz	Child Psychiatrist, Royal Free Hospital
Day 13	Dr. Berelowitz
Day 14	Dr. Hodgson	Wakefield Employment Contract
	Dr, Kirrage	Child JS
	Dr. Cartmel	GP Child 2
Day 15	Professor  Zuckerman	Dean, Royal Free Hospital to 1999
Day 16	Professor Zuckerman
	Dr. Horton	Editor of The Lancet
Day 17	Dr. Horton
Day 18	Dr. Horton
	Professor Hull	Pediatric Research Ethics Expert
Day 19	Mr. Else	CEO, Royal Free Hosptital
	Dr. Jones	GP Child JS  (statement)
	Dr,  Andrew Mills	Consultant Child JS
Day 20	Dr. Andrew Mills
Day 21	Dr. Lloyd-Evans	Child Neurologist, Royal Free Hosptital
	Mr. Phipps	Assistant Finance Officer, Royal Free Hospital
Day 22	Professor Revell	Chairman Histopathology, Royal Free Hospital
	Professor Candy	Peer reviewed 1998 papers. Believed that either both papers or neither paper be published.
Day 23	Dr. Spratt (statement)	GP Child 12
Day 24	Dr. Casson	Gastroenteroligist, Royal Free Hospital Main Patient Contact.  Wrote discharge summaries.
Day 25	Dr. Casson
Day 26	Dr. Casson
	Dr. Salisbury	UK vaccination Expert. Testified on the history of measles vaccine, MMR and Wakefield.  No cross-examination
Day 27	Dr. Salisbury
	Dr, Spratt's documents	Documents on Child 9
Day 28	Mrs. 12	The mother of Child 12. The only parent who testified even though parents (see  Day 199/33 and Day 199/28) stated they wanted to testify.
Day 29	Dr. Jelley	GP child 8
Day 30	Deborah Davies (statement)	Personal Assistant to CEO for Royal Free Hospital
	Sarah Alwyn	Customer Service Manager, UK Legal Aid
Day 31	Cenzig Tarhan	Fi\nance Officer, Royal Free Hospital
Day 32	Dr. Davies	Histopathologist, Royal Free Hosptital
Day 33	Dr. Davies
Day 34	Medical Research Council	Transcript of meeting read in part.  Video played.
Day 35	Professor Rutter	Child Development Expert
Day 36	Professor Rutter
Day 37	Professor Rutter
Day 38	Professor Rutter
Day 39	Professor Rutter
Day 40	Professor Booth	Pediatric Gastroenterology Expert
Day 41	Professor Booth
Day 42	Professor Booth
Day 43	Professor Booth
	Dr. Stauart (additional paragraph to statement)	GP Child 12
	Dr. Davies (addition to statement)	Histopathologist Royal Free Hosptital
	Frances Wharton (statement)	Secretary to Dr. Surtees re Child 2
Day 44	Professor Booth
Day 45	Professor Booth
Day 46	Professor Booth
Day 47	Professor Booth
	Professor Lachmann	Immunology Expert
Case for Dr. Wakefield
Day 48	Dr. Wakefield	Examined by Wakefield's Lawyer
Day 49	Dr. Wakefield
Day 50	Dr. Wakefield
Day 51	Dr. Wakefield
Day 52	Dr. Wakefield
Day 53	Dr. Wakefield
Day 54	Dr. Wakefield
Day 55	Dr. Wakefield
Day 56	Panel Read Documents
Day 57	Dr. Wakefield	Cross-Examined by Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Day 58	Dr. Wakefield	Cross-Examined  by Murch's Lawyer
Day 59	Dr. Wakefield	Cross-Examined  by Murch's Lawyer Cross-Examined  by  GMC's Lawyer
Day 60	Dr. Wakefield
Day 61	Dr. Wakefield
Day 62	Dr. Wakefield
Day 63	Dr. Wakefield
Day 64	Dr. Wakefield
Day 65	Dr. Wakefield
Day 66	Dr. Wakefield
Day 67	Dr. Wakefield
Day 68	Dr. Wakefield	Re-examined by Wakefield's lawyer
Day 69	Dr. Wakefield	Further Cross-Examination by GMC's Lawyer
		Further Re-Examination by Wakefield's Lawyer
		Questioned by the Panel
		Further Cross-Examination by GMC's Lawyer
		Further Re-Examination by Wakefield's Lawyer
Day 70	Legal issue on forcing Mr. Barr to testify.	Mr. Barr was the lawyer suing MMR vaccine makers  for causing autism.  All 11 UK children in the 1998 paper were clients.
Day 71
Day 72	Decision not to force Mr. Barr to testify.
Case for Professor Walker-Smith
Day 73	Professor Walker-Smith	Examined by Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Day 74	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 75	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 76	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 77	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 78	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 79	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 80	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 81	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 82	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 83	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 84	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 85	Professor Walker-Smith	Cross-examined by Wakefield's Lawyer Cross-examined by Murch's Lawyer Cross-examined by  GMC's Lawyer
Day 86	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 87	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 88	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 89	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 90	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 91	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 92	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 93	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 94	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 95	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 96	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 97	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 98	Professor Walker-Smith	Re-examined by Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Day 99	Professor Walker-Smith
Day 100	Professor Walker-Smith concluded	Questioned by the Panel Further Re-examined by Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Day 101	Martin Walker	Legal Assessor discussed claimed conflict of interestby Martin Walker
	Dr. Williams	Expert Witness Gastronenterologist
	Dr. Miller	Expert Witness Gastroenterologist
Day 102	Dr. Miller
Day 103	Dr. Miller
Day 104	Dr. Miller
Day 105	Dr. Miller	Cross-examined by GMC's lawyer
Day 106	Dr. Miller
Day 107	Dr. Thomas	Expert Witness Child Neurologist
Day 108	Dr. Thomas
Day 109	Dr. Miller	Cross-examined by GMC's lawyer
Case for Professor Murch
Day 110	Professor Murch	Examined by Professor Murch's Lawyer
Day 111	Statement of Dr. Horton
	Professor Murch
Day 112	Professor Murch
Day 113	Professor Murch
Day 114	Professor Murch
Day 115	Professor Murch	Cross-examined by GMC's lawyer
Day 116	Professor Murch
Day 117	Professor Murch
Day 118	Professor Murch
Day 119	Professor Murch	Re-examined by Murch's Lawyer
Day 120	Professor Murch	Questioned by the Panel Further Cross-examined by GMC's Lawyer Re-examined by Murch's Lawyer
Day 121	Discussion on Adjournment
Closing Submissions
Day 122	Closing Submissions	GMC's Lawyer
Day 123	Closing Submissions
Day 124	Closing Submissions
Day 125	Closing Submissions
Day 126	Closing Submissions
Day 127	Closing Submissions
Day 128	Closing Submissions
Day 129	Closing Submissions
Day 130	Closing Submissions	Wakefield's Lawyer
Day 131	Closing Submissions
Day 132	Closing Submissions
Day 133	Closing Submissions
Day 134	Closing Submissions
Day 135	Closing Submissions
Day 136	Closing Submissions
Day 137	Closing Submissions	Walker-Smith's Lawyer
Day 138	Closing Submissions
Day 139	Closing Submissions
Day 140	Closing Submissions
Day 141	Closing Submissions
Day 142	Closing Submissions
Day 143	Closing Submissions
Day 144	Closing Submissions
Day 145	Closing Submissions
Day 146	Closing Submissions	Murch's Lawyer
Day 147	Closing Submissions
Day 148	Amendments to Charges
Day 149	Advice from Legal Assessor	Legal Assessor  Mr. Nigel Seed QC
Days 150 to 196	Panel Deliberations (in Camera) on Fact Finding	Panel
Day 197	Fact Finding  Determinations	The chairman read a shorter version of the panel's fact finding determinations. The full version is here.
Sanctions Hearing
Day  198	Submissions On Behalf of GMC	GMC's Lawyer
	No Submissions On Behalf of Dr. Wakefield	Wakefield's Lawyer (no submissions)
Day 199	Submissions On Behalf of Professor Walker-Smith	Testimonial Evidence Sir Christopher Booth Robertr Heuschkel Allan Walker Sir Nicholas Wright
Day 200	Submissions On Behalf of Professor Murch	Testimonial Evidence Edward Piele Michael Green Alison Rodger Concluding Submissions
	Legal Advice	Legal Assessor  Mr. Nigel Seed QC
Days 201 to 216	Panel Deliberations (in Camera) on Sanctions	Panel
Day 217	Sanction Decisions	Panel Sanction Decisions  The GMC published  the same sanctions determinations for each doctor separately. Dr. Wakefield Professor Walker-Smith Professor Murch

Wakefield Disciplinary Hearing Transcripts in Day Order by sheldon101 is licensed under
 a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada License.